For a lawyer, it's bad enough when a federal judge wants to talk about your “ill-considered lawsuit” that has “abused the litigation system in more than one way.” It's worse when that judge tells you that facts in your case “were not as asserted" and that case filings “did not really comply with the subjective and objective good faith requirement." And when the judge says that your complaints about the fraudulent behavior of others are "ironic," you know this is not a judge you want to see again.
But former divorce-lawyer-turned-copyright-hound John Steele isn't deterred by mere judicial rulings about the defects of his peer-to-peer file-sharing cases. Steele is responsible for most of the mass file-sharing litigation currently conducted in Illinois federal courts, and after receiving the above dismissal from Judge Milton Shadur, he continued to file cases.
Read the comments on this post
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий